<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Charm &amp;c.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superweak.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Or, fun from building 54</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Y(4260): Fun with Onia by Ian Edmond</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2006/05/06/the-y4260-fun-with-onia/#comment-7487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Edmond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://superweak.wordpress.com/2006/05/06/the-y4260-fun-with-onia/#comment-7487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I just say that your first few paragraphs explained charmonium - and indeed, the whole concept of quark-antiquark pairs, which I&#039;ve been having a bit of a headache with - so much clearer than the various books I&#039;ve been reading lately. This enthusiastic amateur thanks you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just say that your first few paragraphs explained charmonium &#8211; and indeed, the whole concept of quark-antiquark pairs, which I&#8217;ve been having a bit of a headache with &#8211; so much clearer than the various books I&#8217;ve been reading lately. This enthusiastic amateur thanks you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LHC &#8220;First Beam&#8221; by Recent Links Tagged With "lhc" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/lhc-first-beam/#comment-7465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recent Links Tagged With "lhc" - JabberTags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-7465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] public links &gt;&gt; lhc   LHC “First Beam” Saved by jenniferhanono on Mon 27-10-2008   Black Holes and Revelations: Breakdown of LHC Part 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; lhc   LHC “First Beam” Saved by jenniferhanono on Mon 27-10-2008   Black Holes and Revelations: Breakdown of LHC Part 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liveblogging the LHC turn-on festivities by Ligaram o Grande Colisor e o Mundo Não Acabou &#171; idealismo de buteco</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/liveblogging-the-lhc-turn-on-festivities/#comment-7459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ligaram o Grande Colisor e o Mundo Não Acabou &#171; idealismo de buteco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-7459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pesquisadores em estase blogando o acontecimento direto do local em um verdadeiro liveblogging. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pesquisadores em estase blogando o acontecimento direto do local em um verdadeiro liveblogging. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liveblogging the LHC turn-on festivities by It Works!!! at Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/liveblogging-the-lhc-turn-on-festivities/#comment-7458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It Works!!! at Asymptotia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-7458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] blogging reports from the scene of events over at Resonaances, US/LHC Blogs (several posts), and Superweak, for example. I got the ATLAS readout/image below from the latter. (Presumably this is the shower [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogging reports from the scene of events over at Resonaances, US/LHC Blogs (several posts), and Superweak, for example. I got the ATLAS readout/image below from the latter. (Presumably this is the shower [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liveblogging the LHC turn-on festivities by LHC: D-day at last &#171; Antimatter</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/liveblogging-the-lhc-turn-on-festivities/#comment-7457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LHC: D-day at last &#171; Antimatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-7457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] blogs by physicists at the scene describing the day&#8217;s events at sites such as  US LHC Blog, RESONAANCES, Charm&amp;C, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogs by physicists at the scene describing the day&#8217;s events at sites such as  US LHC Blog, RESONAANCES, Charm&amp;C, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Friendly Reminder&#8230; by superweak</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/a-friendly-reminder/#comment-7456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superweak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-7456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, but notice that everyone who&#039;s not in a cave knows about the LHC now?  CERN does its PR much, much better than any of the US HEP labs.  This is an *event* which could be scheduled reasonably far in advance.  Collisions at 10 TeV are much harder to anticipate.

At any rate it will be the first time beam goes through ATLAS, so it&#039;s exciting for the detector experts - they&#039;ll have beam-gas events and halo muons to work with, not just cosmic rays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but notice that everyone who&#8217;s not in a cave knows about the LHC now?  CERN does its PR much, much better than any of the US HEP labs.  This is an *event* which could be scheduled reasonably far in advance.  Collisions at 10 TeV are much harder to anticipate.</p>
<p>At any rate it will be the first time beam goes through ATLAS, so it&#8217;s exciting for the detector experts &#8211; they&#8217;ll have beam-gas events and halo muons to work with, not just cosmic rays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Friendly Reminder&#8230; by Matt R.</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/a-friendly-reminder/#comment-7455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-7455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;m thinking &quot;one beam circulating&quot; is not worth being awake at 3 AM for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m thinking &#8220;one beam circulating&#8221; is not worth being awake at 3 AM for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Friendly Reminder&#8230; by Laura</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/a-friendly-reminder/#comment-7454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-7454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Charm &amp;c is now &quot;fun from some CERN building&quot;?

I don&#039;t really understand why the first circulating beam is what the world has decided to get really excited about.  It is exciting, but aren&#039;t the first collisions at energies that have never been made before more the sort of thing to throw pajama parties over?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Charm &amp;c is now &#8220;fun from some CERN building&#8221;?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really understand why the first circulating beam is what the world has decided to get really excited about.  It is exciting, but aren&#8217;t the first collisions at energies that have never been made before more the sort of thing to throw pajama parties over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Information Entropy and Experiments by Border Crossing Stats &#187; Information Entropy and Experiments Charm &#38;c.</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2007/12/24/information-entropy-and-experiments/#comment-7428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Border Crossing Stats &#187; Information Entropy and Experiments Charm &#38;c.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/2007/12/24/information-entropy-and-experiments/#comment-7428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Find more about it all here [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Find more about it all here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The last* CLEO-c double tag event by carlbrannen</title>
		<link>http://superweak.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/the-last-cleo-c-double-tag-event/#comment-7427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carlbrannen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superweak.wordpress.com/?p=91#comment-7427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was about to comment that one of the pi particles had the wrong charge. On my monitor, both the blue pis look like they&#039;re marked &quot;pi-&quot; because the vertical bar distinguishing + from - is hard to see. Sure enough, the + particles are going counter clockwise and the - particles the other way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to comment that one of the pi particles had the wrong charge. On my monitor, both the blue pis look like they&#8217;re marked &#8220;pi-&#8221; because the vertical bar distinguishing + from &#8211; is hard to see. Sure enough, the + particles are going counter clockwise and the &#8211; particles the other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

